Antwort Why were tanks not successful? Weitere Antworten – Why were tanks not effective
The decision of the British commander-in-chief, Sir Douglas Haig, to reveal the secret weapon before large numbers of tanks had become available generated criticism, but the tanks' real problems were slow speed, mechanical failures, and inability to cross soft or heavily cratered ground.Why did the British create the tank, and why was the tank unsuccessful in revolutionizing warfare The British created the tank to be able to go to over trenches, which were a new part of warfare. However, there were not enough tanks to revolutionize warfare.The great weakness of the tank predecessor, the armoured car, was that it required smooth terrain to move upon, and new developments were needed for cross-country capability. The tank was originally designed as a special weapon to solve an unusual tactical situation: the stalemate of the trenches on the Western Front.
Were tanks effective in ww2 : Armoured warfare was to be a vital part of the fighting in the Second World War. In the early years of the war, Germany held the initiative. German forces used Blitzkrieg tactics in France in 1940, making full use of the speed and armour of tanks to break through enemy defences.
Who had better tanks in WWII
Soviet
By October 1942, the general opinion was that Soviet tanks were among the best in the world, with Life magazine writing that "The best tanks in the world today are probably the Russian tanks…". The T-34 outclassed every German tank in service at the time of its introduction.
Why didn t Germany build more tanks : Such low production numbers were due to tanks being given a low priority for steel relative to the more conventional needs of an army, such as artillery shells.
Unfortunately, the tanks themselves were still slow, cumbersome and prone to technical problems. And in the glutinous November Somme mud, they were also vulnerable to getting stuck.
The 304th Tank Brigade then took part in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive on September 26, 1918. The use of tanks on the battlefields of WWI yielded mixed results. Many of the tanks had mechanical problems, and the poor mobility limited the military significance of the tank in WWI.
Why were tanks unreliable in ww1
The first tanks were mechanically unreliable. There were problems that caused considerable attrition rates during combat deployment and transit. The heavily shelled terrain was impassable to conventional vehicles, and only highly mobile tanks such as the Renault FTs and Mark IV performed reasonably well.Could the shell from a WW2 tank such as a Panzer IV penetrate the armor of a modern tank such as the M1-Abrams Highly unlikely. Most WWII projectiles were full caliber diameter hardened rounds and were dependent on velocity for penetration.Some were rushed into service too quickly and proved notoriously unreliable. Others spent too long in development, or only achieved a degree of usefulness after numerous modifications. Most lacked the armour to resist enemy anti-tank weapons, and nearly all were under-gunned.
The German 88 is more powerful than any American tank gun used during the course of most of the war. The German tank is much heavier and therefore its armor is much thicker than that of any American tank. The tracks of the former are much wider, with perhaps a less vulnerable suspension system than that of the latter.
What were the most overrated tanks in WW2 : The most overrated German WWII tank That would be the Tiger I.
Could the Soviets have won WWII alone : Undoubtedly the Russians paid the highest price because of the unimaginable loss of lives, but no one country can claim the victory. In WWII could the Soviet Union defeat Germany alone, without outside help No.
Why did Germans have better tanks than us
The German 88 is more powerful than any American tank gun used during the course of most of the war. The German tank is much heavier and therefore its armor is much thicker than that of any American tank. The tracks of the former are much wider, with perhaps a less vulnerable suspension system than that of the latter.
Furthermore, due to the shape of the underlying tractor and undue vibrations, shooting from the tank was both difficult and inevitably inaccurate. These limitations have caused the Bob Semple Tank to frequently make lists of "Worst ever tanks".The early tanks were slow and unreliable, shown by the fact that of the 49 tanks deployed for the battle only 25 actually moved forward at the start of the attack. As production increased and reliability improved, they were used in greater numbers.
Did tanks have an advantage in ww1 : One of the few ways in which tanks were effective during the war was their ability to break through barbed wire defences. Even then, their tracks were still at risk of becoming entangled. As the war progressed, the Army found better ways to utilise their new weapon and exploit its advantages.