Antwort What made the T 34 so good? Weitere Antworten – What was so good about the T-34

Its main strength was its cost and production time, meaning that German panzer forces would often fight against Soviet tank forces several times their size. The T-34 is also a critical part of the mechanized divisions that form the backbone of the Deep Battle Strategy.German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks.On paper, it's very even. The T-34/85 wasn't as reliable as many people think, but it had at least an equal gun and armour to the best Sherman (jumbo). In practise, the Sherman was superior.

Was the T-34 the best tank in WWII : [iii] At its inception, the T-34 was the fastest and most powerful tank in its class. While other tanks eventual bridged the engineering gap, the T-34's relative simplicity and economy of production allowed it to be the most produced tank of the war.

Was the T-34 really that good

Look when compared to the enemy tanks the t-34. Had a clear advantage in 1941. The german panzer 1 and panzer 2 tanks were no match for it at all having light armor and light weaponry they stood no

Was the T-34 a bad tank : The T-34 is discussed here as a case history. (8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster.

The T-34 had a much more powerful gun in the 85 mm ,and the 75 mm was usable. Both would be past over for newer and more powerful weapons. The Mk4 was easier on the crew to operate and was easier for the crew to work together. The T34 had the better armor.

Had superior turret in the side armor. The t-34 was vastly more mobile while the panzer. 4 was far easier to use. Finally it's difficult to rank one of the two significantly. Higher than the other.

What is the weakness of the T-34

The T-34 (1940) has a weak turret, which even low-tier guns can penetrate. It is recommended to aim for the turret ring, as the cramped crew compartment will result in an easy crew kill. Another weak spot of the T-34 is the turret cheeks – there are some flat spots that are 45 mm, disabling the turret crew and the gun.For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster. A combat account from Operation Barbarossa highlights the problem with the T-34/76's fire control systems and also why its overall combat power is so overrated.The T-34/76 was dominant in the early stages of the Second World War and came as a nasty surprise to the Germans in 1941. The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.

The main threat to Sherman's were not the Panthers or Tigers but anti tank cannons set in ambush, STuG tanks laying traps. Even up to the end of the war , Sherman's often engaged Panzer IVs more often than anything else, and held their own.

Was the T-34 tank any good : The T-34/76 was dominant in the early stages of the Second World War and came as a nasty surprise to the Germans in 1941. The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.

Is Panzer 4 better than T-34 : The T-34 had a much more powerful gun in the 85 mm ,and the 75 mm was usable. Both would be past over for newer and more powerful weapons. The Mk4 was easier on the crew to operate and was easier for the crew to work together. The T34 had the better armor.

Did Germans fear Shermans

Did German Panzer crews fear facing American Sherman tanks on the battlefield during World War II Yes. The panzer crew knew it was always outnumbered. If they saw 1 Sherman they always were afraid of the other 4.

Had superior turret in the side armor. The t-34 was vastly more mobile while the panzer. 4 was far easier to use. Finally it's difficult to rank one of the two significantly. Higher than the other.Hitler was not angry, or vindictive – far from it. He seemed relieved. Goebbels thought the German leader looked as if a great burden had fallen from his shoulders. He had earlier said Normandy was a possible landing site, for one thing.

What did Soviet tankers think of the Sherman : The Sherman was largely held in good regard and viewed positively by many Soviet tank-crews which operated it before, with compliments mainly given to its reliability, ease of maintenance, generally good firepower (referring especially to the 76mm-gun version) and decent armour protection, as well as an auxiliary power …