Antwort How to beat T-34? Weitere Antworten – What is the weakness of the T-34
The T-34/76's one great weakness was its fire control efficiency. It suffered from the same two-man turret syndrome as other Soviet tanks in this period, namely that the tank's commander, gun aimer, gun firer and platoon commander (if a platoon leader), were all the same person.The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.[iii] At its inception, the T-34 was the fastest and most powerful tank in its class. While other tanks eventual bridged the engineering gap, the T-34's relative simplicity and economy of production allowed it to be the most produced tank of the war.
What was the problem with the T-34 tank : Early T-34s suffered from poor manufacturing and quality controls. Notable issues were in defective armour plates, poor welding, unreliable transmissions, and a lack of radios. Much of theses defects were overcome (mostly) in the 1940 version of the T-34.
Can a T-34 penetrate a tiger
The 85 mm gun could penetrate the turret front of a Tiger I tank from 500 m (550 yd) and the driver's front plate from 300 m (330 yd) at the side angle of 30 degrees, and the larger turret enabled the addition of another crew member, allowing the roles of commander and gunner to be separated and increasing the rate of …
Did the Germans fear the T-34 : Prior to the invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, the German armed forces were not aware of two newly developed Soviet tanks, the T-34 and the KV. As a result, they were surprised when they met them in combat for the first time in June 1941.
In some ways the t-34 does infact have better armour than the tiger 1 at by it beeing sloped wich causes some shells to ricochet at high angles. The germans later adopted this sloped armour technology for their later tanks like the panther and tiger 2.
German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks.
What made the T-34 so good
Its main strength was its cost and production time, meaning that German panzer forces would often fight against Soviet tank forces several times their size. The T-34 is also a critical part of the mechanized divisions that form the backbone of the Deep Battle Strategy.In some ways the t-34 does infact have better armour than the tiger 1 at by it beeing sloped wich causes some shells to ricochet at high angles. The germans later adopted this sloped armour technology for their later tanks like the panther and tiger 2.The T-34-85 cant pen the Tiger II H anywhere from the front, the Tiger II P is easy but the H is invincible from the front to the 85mm.
When introduced, its 76.2 mm (3 in) tank gun was more powerful than many of its contemporaries, and its 60-degree sloped armour provided good protection against anti-tank weapons. The T-34 had a profound effect on the conflict on the Eastern Front, and had a long-lasting impact on tank design.
Was the T-34 better than the panzer : German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks.
Could a T-34 penetrate a Tiger : The 85 mm gun could penetrate the turret front of a Tiger I tank from 500 m (550 yd) and the driver's front plate from 300 m (330 yd) at the side angle of 30 degrees, and the larger turret enabled the addition of another crew member, allowing the roles of commander and gunner to be separated and increasing the rate of …
Can a T-34 destroy a Tiger
They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
If the T34 doesn't have APCR shells then the T34 will struggle to penetrate the Tiger at 2000 meters and the Tiger should easily win and only lose 1 tank. On the note of armor the T34 did only have 45mm on the frontal plate but the 60 degree angling means it has an effective thickness of 90mm.The two had fairly equivalent armor, firepower, and mobility, but the Sherman was far more reliable and had much better sights. The later T34–85 did surpass the Sherman in firepower though.
Could a Tiger 2 beat an Abrams : No, a WWII Tiger Tank Can't Destroy an Abrams, Armchair War Historian Explains Why. The German Tiger tank of Second World War fame is a machine wrapped in a mythos far stronger and less brittle than the 100mm front armor plating the tank drove into battle wearing.